Why is it required to react faster when controlling the rotor RPM of a small helicopter compared to a large one when an engine failure occurs?
-
A
Small helicopters have less inertia, requiring quicker reactions to maintain control.
-
B
Large helicopters have more responsive control systems, reducing the need for quick reactions.
-
C
Small helicopters experience less aerodynamic stability, making slower reactions acceptable.
-
D
Large helicopters are inherently less stable, requiring slower but deliberate control inputs.
A higher useful load increases the overall weight of the aircraft, which can lead to increased inertia. This affects the helicopter's responsiveness to cyclic inputs, making manoeuvres feel heavier and requiring more effort from the Pilot to achieve the desired attitudes and movements. In general, the greater the mass, the greater the inertia.
Large helicopters have heavier blades to produce the required lift to support the increased mass. The high inertia blades result in a gentler NR decay. A relatively massive rotor decelerates slower. Greater inertia leads to NR being more sensitive to small changes of pitch and especially to any g in turns. NR must, therefore, be monitored closely to avoid exceeding the limits.
The worst case scenario is engine failure in a light helicopter with a relatively light rotor, whilst large amounts of collective are applied. A light helicopter requires the quickest response in case of engine failure by reducing the collective pitch sufficiently quickly to avoid a significant decay in NR and by responding quickly with the yaw pedals to cancel the yaw.
Your Notes (not visible to others)
This question has appeared on the real examination, you can find the related countries below.
-
France3
-
Spain2