19 / 20
Which of the following actions would be the most appropriate if microbursts are forecast and observed immediately prior to take-off?
  • A
    Reduce the take-off speed during take-off and increase the climb-out gradient.
  • B
    Delay the take-off.
  • C
    Increase the climb-out gradient.
  • D
    Increase the take-off speed during take-off.
Microbursts are short lived, with peak winds lasting only 5 minutes or less. If they're caused by a single-cell storm, you can often delay your take-off, divert or delay your arrival until the storm is clear. If you see one, wait it out. Flying through or landing in the face of a microburst is simply the worst option.
  • If microbursts are observed prior to take-off => Delay the take-off.
  • If microbursts are observed prior to the approach => Hold until conditions improve.
  • If microbursts are observed during the approach => The approach speed should be increased, the landing gear should remain extended and the flaps deployed.

Your Notes (not visible to others)



This question has appeared on the real examination, you can find the related countries below.

  • France
    91
  • Poland
    20
  • Spain
    12
  • Austro Control
    9
  • Sweden
    9
  • United Kingdom
    7
  • Czech Republic
    4
  • Norway
    3
  • Hungary
    2
  • Romania
    2
  • Croatia
    1
  • Germany
    1
  • Greece
    1
  • Hong Kong
    1
  • Ireland
    1
  • Latvia
    1
  • Lithuania
    1
  • Pakistan
    1
  • Portugal
    1
  • Serbia
    1
  • Slovakia
    1
  • Thailand
    1
Keyboard Shortcut Use Keyboard Shortcuts